Date: Thu, 6 Jan 94 04:30:06 PST From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #2 To: tcp-group-digest TCP-Group Digest Thu, 6 Jan 94 Volume 94 : Issue 2 Today's Topics: AX25 for Linux version 1.0 or ax25006 DOS-OS/2 TCP/IP Extended KISS and SMACK specifications? (2 msgs) Linux AX.25 Code - Apology new ax25.007 for linux Thanks Alan NOS SMTP Gateway (4 msgs) subscribe unsubscribe Send Replies or notes for publication to: . Subscription requests to . Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 94 21:01:28 CET From: BARRY TITMARSH Subject: AX25 for Linux version 1.0 or ax25006 To: TCP-GROUP Well My thanks to Alan Cox for nice beit of Demo code. I have it axattch'd /dev/ttyS1 mycall to my Linux kernel lx0.99pl14L and it works and waiting for the real stuff, since to so called real ;-0 stuff from FvK who?? well, dont seem to work at all.? And if it replaces my DOS(wnos-5)> Subject: Extended KISS and SMACK specifications? To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu > My PK-88 supports "Extended KISS". This appears to include checksums, > reporting of the transmission of a packet, and polling of the TNC by the > host. Wow. Is this all a good thing? KISS = "Keep It Simple, Stupid" louie wa3ymh ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 09:15 PST From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) Subject: Linux AX.25 Code - Apology To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu > Reply-To: iiitac@pyr.swan.ac.uk > Subject: AX.25 code > > I'm not sure where this silly rumour came from (I have a couple of nasty > suspicions...) but the AX.25 code is alive and well. The other contributors > to the code have no say in things anyway - they being Regents Of UCB and > the code being used in accordance with the berkeley license. No, it was just me piling conjecture on top of conjecture, and getting paranoid, and reading more into what I heard than was there. Sorry. Bruce -- Bruce Perens AB6YM Bruce@Pixar.com 510-215-3502 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 05 Jan 94 22:15:25 CET From: BARRY TITMARSH Subject: new ax25.007 for linux Thanks Alan To: TCP-GROUP Ok just ftp'd the new ax25 linux code. and testing it now looks nice.. My thanks again Alan.. Barry GM8SAU/DC0HK PS, its on 137.44.12.4:/pub/Linux/AX25007/ two files ax25krnl.tgz and ax25user.tgz in case you are looking for it. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 10:48:53 CST From: "John Martin" Subject: NOS SMTP Gateway To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu Has anyone figured a way to get NOS SMTP to do the following: Try to send direct to station. If station not on air (after n tries), send mail to a SMTP gateway. The gateway machine would then hold the mail until the station is heard? We want a way to hold mail without having to leave PCs on all the time, but prefer direct mail if station is on the air. Thanks, John kb5ggo --- martin@server.cdpa.state.ms.us kb5ggo@k5qne.ms ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 14:03:40 EST From: crompton@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (D. Crompton) Subject: NOS SMTP Gateway To: martin@server.cdpa.state.ms.us I thought that was what POP was for - works fine here. Stations can interogate for mail as they desire, when they desire. Doug ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 13:26:25 CST From: "John Martin" Subject: NOS SMTP Gateway To: crompton@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL On Wed, 5 Jan 94 14:03:40 EST, D. Crompton wrote: >I thought that was what POP was for - works fine here. Stations can interogate >for mail as they desire, when they desire. > >Doug Yes, POP works well for Ethernet, but we are using various NOS over radio, and they don't have a POP client. Are there any NOS's that have both POP server and client?? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 16:55:52 EST From: crompton@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (D. Crompton) Subject: NOS SMTP Gateway To: crompton@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL, martin@server.cdpa.state.ms.us JNOS and many of it's variations include defines in config.h for pop2/3 server and client. You can have them all or whichever you want. Here, as the server I have pop2 and 3 server defined. I compile the user code for pop3 client. I believe that the pre-compiled exe's for JNOS that are floating around have pop3 client defined. Doug ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 1994 13:58:16 GMT+0200 From: "Jack Stiekema" Subject: subscribe To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu Hello, sri to bother you all, where can i subscribe to this mailing group? Kind regards, Jack +----------------------------------------------------+ | Victron bv POB 31 9700 AA Groningen Holland | | phone: +31 50 446222 fax: +31 50 424107 | +----------------------------------------------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 21:40:32 CST From: Daniel Ortmann Subject: unsubscribe To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 16:07:56 PST From: enge@almaden.ibm.com To: TCP-GROUP@UCSD.EDU Subject: Re: DOS-OS/2 TCP/IP Reply-To: enge@almaden.ibm.com News-Software: UReply 3.1 References: <9401052222.AA07297@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL> I am a happy user of both the IBM DOS/TCPIP and the OS2/TCPIP. I use them at home primarily as an FTP server to move files between machines. I also do NFS mounts of UNIX servers from my OS/2 machines to get more disk space :-) Note that the OS/2 version will support DOS programs using the WinSock interface also. What I would really like is a "hook" for AX.25! I am looking at this for the OS/2 version. Roy Engehausen -- AA4RE -- enge@almaden.ibm.com ------------------------------ End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #2 ******************************